On Jul 26, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Alex Robinson wrote: > My understanding of > > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#q4 > > is that vendor specific properties are perfectly valid (even if to > be avoided). > > However, using them makes the W3's CSS validator go bonkers crazy. Is > that just another failing of the validator or am I wrong about the > validity issue?
This should provide an answer, I think. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-css/2005Dec/ 0012.html> Bottom-line is: the vendor-specific extension conforms to the syntax of CSS (2, 3), but is not valid CSS (2, 3) (unknown property/value pair). (I wouldn't worry about it, and go ahead and use the -moz- extension you have in mind, just as I would use a -o- extension or a -ktml- extension if needed). Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh <http://emps.l-c-n.com> ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
