I wrote: > <fieldset> > <div class="container"> > <legend><span>Legend</span></legend> > content... > </div> > </fieldset>
francky wrote: >Then it is very close to the idea to forget the whole fieldset-coding, >and replace it by common div's and classes: > ><div class="fieldset-imi"> > <div class="legend-imi">a young HTML monkey - imitation</div> > <div class="field-imi">content...</div> ></div> With one important exception -- the semantic value of having fieldset and legend markup is retained. I won't argue that it doesn't add extra code -- it does -- but it adds that code with deference to the main purpose of markup. The <legend> remains a <legend>, which happens to have an additional inline wrapper inside. The <fieldset> remains a <fieldset>, which happens to include an additional wrapper <div> within it. > Oops, reading back the original post of Kim Sieger "Anyone know of a way > to work around this without using a hack and without having to add > conditional comments on all 2,000 of my pages?". > So, if only the css can be changed, all solutions with adding extra > <div>'s in the html are not too adequate... True, if HTML tags were conditional comments.... As they are not, I'm not sure I would consider this a hack, any more than using wrapper <div>s is a hack to create a multi-column layout. Either way, the intent is to provide a variety of options for Kim to consider. He will decide what compromise works best for him. As long as the options work for him, that is enough. :-) Thanks, Michael ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
