David Dorward wrote:
> (and see the usual rants about why XHTML isn't a good choice for the 
> WWW in the first place)

You could at least point(link) to one of those rants - if there are any
with some substantial information around. Might be useful.

<rant>

XHTML is the *perfect choice* for the WWW. It just has to be *XHTML*...
<http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.html>
<http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.xhtml>
...and not "something else".

</rant> :-)

regards
        Georg
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to