David Dorward wrote: > (and see the usual rants about why XHTML isn't a good choice for the > WWW in the first place)
You could at least point(link) to one of those rants - if there are any with some substantial information around. Might be useful. <rant> XHTML is the *perfect choice* for the WWW. It just has to be *XHTML*... <http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.html> <http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.xhtml> ...and not "something else". </rant> :-) regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
