Christian Montoya wrote: >I don't see any way around that... except to use smaller images. If >CSS backgrounds were scalable, you could take the images out of the >markup, but they aren't. > > I don't think there is a way around it. For most people I think it'll be ok, but since the example blows up so badly I thought it was worth mentioning. Smaller images would help minimize the damage when it does blow up, and for most applications I think using smaller images would be better (who needs the text so big that single words don't fit on the screen?), but for the example, I wanted to show that they could be scalable to very large sizes.
>One solution would be to add the img tags in as CSS generated content, >but that is not widely supported. > > I'm unfamiliar with this. For my project the images have to be in the markup itself, so it doesn't sound like it's an option for me. But I'll have to look into it for the example. Thanks for the tip! > >I think the solution is just to wrap the anchor around the entire >thing, including the images. > That's probably what I'll end up doing. I'm worried that it'll throw the positioning off, but I'll just have to try it out to see what happens. Thanks, -Craig Morris ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
