On 12/2/05, Michael Hulse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not just hide the JS from Firefox? If it's only needed for IE, > then why oh why haven't you put it behind a conditional comment?
Yeah, good idea. Hehe, I feel silly for not thinking of that... duh! On 12/2/05, Michael Hulse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not too sure of a workaround for it. Seems like a Firefox bug/issue... > Maybe fixed in the next update? I guess what I meant by "Not too sure of a workaround" was that I do not no how to fix a Firefox JS bug (if it is one, I am just making a big fat guess...). Conditional comments are a temp fix... although, for the Suckerfish JS, I agree, it is a very good idea just to feed it to IE... If it is a bug though, one would hope they would fix the problem rather than have us web-developers hide JS from Firefox... I am sure it happens with other scripts where the JS needs to be read by Firefox... Specifically, I think the problem has to do with the "document.getElementById". I have seen this issue happen with other sites and other scripts in Firefox... Cheers, Micky -- BCC for Privacy: http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~watrous/bcc-for-privacy.html My del.icio.us: http://del.icio.us/mhulse ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
