I'm not sure but I think Dw uses ( was ? ) using the Presto layout 
engine, the same that works inside Opera browsers.
If so, you logicaly cannot rely / trust it to render properly pages 
cross-browser.
But I'm not sure... Someone should confirm this...

Guillaume.

> Matt Poyner wrote:
>
>> We are getting ready to upgrade to Dreamweaver 8 here and I am wondering
>> if anyone has had time to work with it much yet?
>
>
>> Does the program do CSS layout by default, or does it mix tables and
>> css together, or can you choose?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been using version 8 since the demo was available and have had 
> pretty good luck with it. Your main question is somewhat difficult to 
> answer because, although Dreamweaver has a "design view", the markup 
> the editor generates has always (as far as I know) been left up to the 
> developer--you can work with any tag you need. Whether you wish to 
> work with tables or with more semantic markup when appropriate, 
> Dreamweaver can accommodate you. In the end, though, *you* still have 
> to direct the markup, CSS, and methodology used. I guess the best 
> answer is: you can choose the markup and the CSS and mix them any way 
> you like.
>
> The standards and CSS support in version 8 is allot better than 
> previous versions and the design view handles CSS layouts pretty well. 
> I've still managed to wreck it with some off the wall stuff, but most 
> of the basic layout methods I've tested work great. That being said, I 
> still don't rely on design view for accuracy. All I care about is that 
> it is close enough for me to get and idea of how things look and that 
> it allows me to edit copy quickly. I do all of my formal testing in 
> browsers and all of my markup in code view.
>
> Altogether, I love it.
>

______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to