Hi Jérôme, > Setting aside the debate "should we or should we not use IR > techniques", I might have not expressed myself correctly in my post. > > I understand the method and its benefits. I was just stressing that: > > 1. Problems remain if a user can display images and bumps up font size > (either the text shows through (unless you are willing to use extra > large images to account for worst case scenario), or the image > becomes blurry, even if you specify its size using relative units > like you do in another example). Some users I know must increase > their font-size to 500% to be able to read. > > 2. Even if anchors are used instead of images, since take into > account the css on/img off scenario, you have a problem if you want > to use transparent / partially transparent images to replace your > text, since your text must be hidden "under" the image.
Hi Jérôme, I was just pointing out that this technique is not limited to using a shim, that's all (NP with your post at all ;). I agree with you , there are so many issues/parameters to deal with that it's impossible to cover everything. Best, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com PS: where are you from with all these é and ô in your name? ;) ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
