You don't have to do a table... you could use floated divs. It's more accessible and will probably work the same way.
On 9/19/05, CJ Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, it's associated; The bullets on the right describe the picture on > the left. My apologies for not making that clear. > > I know the table isn't the ideal solution, but it's the only one I could > come up with. Perhaps I'll get lucky with CSS 3. :) > > Looks like I get to play with tables. Oh joy! > > -----Original Message----- > Is the graphic associated with the list or is it just random decoration? > If it /is/ associated, a table would be an OK (if not ideal) element to > semantically link these elements together. > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > Supported by evolt.org <http://evolt.org> -- > http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
