Hi Michael, > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 May 2005 18:16
<snip> > In contrast, one argument in favor of block-level content > within list items may be that just because something is a > list item doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't warrant > further elaboration or structure. Sure, I agree that an individual list-item might use block-level content. > > If the content in question isn't an integral part of a list > item, then it should be placed outside the list; perhaps > before as an introduction or after as a footnote. Hmm, I'll need to have a good think about how my content works - maybe some use cases. > At the end of the day, I don't think you will be committing > semantic hara-kiri by using this method to structure your list. Yeah, it's a compromise I can live with. It would be nice to have a "proper" way of doing it though :-/ Cheers, Dave. -- David Balch. | Web developer. T: +44 (0)1865 280979 | Technology-Assisted Lifelong Learning. F: +44 (0)1865 280982 | University of Oxford. E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TALL, OUDCE and the University of Oxford accept no legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are only those of the author and not those of TALL, or OUDCE, or the University of Oxford. If this email has come to you in error please delete it and any attachments ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
