On 5/24/05, Brian Cummiskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uwe Kaiser wrote: > > > Do we really need the extension ".css"? And if yes, why? > > There may be a better reason behind this, but... the extention triggers > the webserver to serve the page in the proper format. > > You can cal4l it anything you want, so long as you force the "header: > content-type" of "text/css".
Also, humans have to edit them and would like to know what a file is and operating systems associate files by extension. You can also set your server up not to make certain files indexable by file extension. I wonder what the benefits of omitting the extension are? ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
