From: Ed Gerck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 11:43:19 -0800 To: David Honig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], "John R. Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ed Gerck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >.>... >> The voting apparatus may keep a serial record of each vote, in order, for >> auditing purposes. > >No, it MUST not. See the FEC standards on voting. The FEC standards also >demand "storage alocation scrambling" in order to avoid even a serial order >of storage. In Cambridge, Massachusetts, a preferential voting system is used which is voting order depenent. This requires that all ballots be numbered so that can be processed in the same order on a recount or else different results could occur because of the change in order. >.>...
- Re: issuing smartcards is likely to be cheap [Was:... Rich Salz
- Re: issuing smartcards is likely to be cheap [Was:... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: issuing smartcards is likely to be cheap ... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: smartcards, electronic ballots John R. Levine
- Re: smartcards, electronic ballots William Allen Simpson
- Re: smartcards, electronic ballots Ed Gerck
- Re: smartcards, electronic ballots David Honig
- Re: smartcards, electronic ballots Ed Gerck
- Re: smartcards, electronic ba... William Allen Simpson
- Re: smartcards, electroni... Ed Gerck
- Re: smartcards, electronic ba... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: smartcards, electronic ballots John R. Levine
- Re: smartcards, electronic ballots Dan Geer
- Re: smartcards, electronic ba... R. Hirschfeld
- Re: smartcards, electronic ballots William Allen Simpson
- Re: smartcards, electronic ba... David Honig
- Re: smartcards, electroni... William Allen Simpson