-- t 01:41 PM 7/27/2000 -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote: > I'll also note that provably secure multicast is an ongoing project > over at Honeyman's CITI. I do not understand what is meant by "provably secure". One can only prove security against a particular threat. There will always be yet another attack. Few things are secure against rubber hoses and hot pincers, or against foolishness and carelessness, which tends to be even more common than rubber hoses. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG hgnaRqit9agzllSnw2X9yTc3Mv4mTDsHIYCVcnHj 4Wzk/YmMsX8xsDK6uqPjsGnGsXCOQbZgT9lVrh1Th
- A proposal for secure videoconferencing and video me... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... eli+
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... Eugene Leitl
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferen... Steve Reid
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconf... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... Steve Reid
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... amanda
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... William Allen Simpson
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferen... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconf... Rich Salz
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure ... Derek Atkins
- Re: A proposal for secure ... RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: A proposal for secure ... R. Hirschfeld
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... amanda
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... Lynn . Wheeler