Grant Bayley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The silly part is, and I hope someone from Microsoft is listening, but why
>> is this document distributed as a .exe file when the previous page says
>> "Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader"?
Microsoft hasn't yet figured out how to digitally sign content without
embedding it in a .exe file, and they digitally sign all their
downloads.
"Lyle Seaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Are you _sure_ that nonsense was in every
>> copy of kerberos.exe?
>>
>> Not to worry, the document didn't reveal
>> one snippet of information that wasn't already
>> in the public domain. Nice introduction to how
>> Kerberos works, but I hope they don't claim
>> *that* as trade secret. Well, the cat's out of the
>> bag now, isn't it?
The document we're discussing is kerbspec.exe. It contains
information which, to the best of my knowledge, had not yet been
reverse-engineered.
Marc
