At 12:12 AM 01/27/2000 +0000, Ben Laurie wrote: >I can't quite see the point of forward stego. I'll leave it to Russ to explain his application if he wants to. > Why not publish something >public key encrypted and publish the private key later? Symmetric cryptography has two advantages in this application: 1. it requires fewer resources to implement and 2. there aren't any data dependent vulnerabilities like there are with public key algorithms. It's like encrypted e-mail: you use the symmetric key for the data and the public key to encrypt the symmetric key. Since the symmetric key is secret random data, it's less susceptable to attack. Rick. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: The problem with Steganography Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: The problem with Steganography Russell Nelson
- Re: The problem with Steganography William Allen Simpson
- Re: The problem with Steganography P.J. Ponder
- Re: The problem with Steganography Rick Smith
- Re: The problem with Steganography Ben Laurie
- Re: The problem with Steganography Rick Smith
- Re: The problem with Steganog... Ben Laurie
- Re: The problem with Steg... Russell Nelson
- Re: The problem with Steg... Rick Smith
- Re: The problem with Steganography lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: The problem with Steganography lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: The problem with Steganography Alexandre Alvarez
- Re: The problem with Steganography Steven M. Bellovin