According to the Commerce Department, the list of "denied persons" is at:
http://www.bxa.doc.gov/DPL/Default.htm
And the list, I'm told in email, is "not a problem if you are posting
something." By that I assume they mean on the web.
-Declan
************
At 11:52 1/18/2000 , Tim May wrote:
>At 7:44 AM -0800 2000-01-18, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> >********
> >
> >>Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:01:49 -0500
> >>From: "JIM LEWIS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>....
> >>a) If you post encryption source code to a site on the net and anyone can
> >>access it, you do not need to have it reviewed by BXA or obtain a license.
>....
> >>c) You do need to send BXA an E-mail with the internet location of the
> >>posted source code and you are prohibited from sending (as opposed to
> >>posting) the encryption source code to a terrorist country or an
> >>individual on one of our denial lists.
>
>
>"Prohibited from sending (as opposed to posting)..."
>
>What category to mailing lists fall into? They are a form of "sending" more
>than a form of "posting" (in the sense of placing on a Web site or even
>posting to a Usenet group).
>
>If there are subscribers from "terrorist countries" or "an individual on
>one our denial lists" (Gee, how can I get on that list?), is the new law
>being broken?
>
>Do mailing lists like Cypherpunks and Coderpunks have to screen who gets to
>join? Do they have to warn those who submit code that "evil persons" may be
>receiving what they send?
>
>--Tim May
>
>print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
>)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`
>---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
>Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
>ComSec 3DES: 831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
>W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
>"Cyphernomicon" | black markets, collapse of governments.
>
