-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, William H. Geiger III wrote:
> In <v04210101b41578834ee3@[204.167.100.139]>, on 09/27/99
> at 03:41 PM, Robert Hettinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >Probably IBM will first want to see how attractive the technology is to
> >punters. At least the approach of using an ancillary encryption chip
> >should keep IBM safe from the nightmare Intel faced when it attempted to
> >railroad CPU ID numbers on users.
>
> No Code == No Trust!
>
> This has all the security/trust problems that Intel's RNG does and more. I
> wouldn't touch this thing with a ten foot poll.
I don't see what this paranoia gains you.
If you do not trust the crypto processor then you should throw the
whole machine out - there are *so* many other ways that IBM could have
compromised the system.
This is doubly interesting given you choice of operating system
(as mentioned in your .sig).
Regards,
Damien Miller
- --
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.ilogic.com.au/~dmiller
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE38r9IormJ9RG1dI8RAlKbAJ0ZfyuIjjyJ8MYfD0K5r/c/ieHtQwCggqcf
Iu2q9DmK5cLmtKSUWceJras=
=Ok+o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
