HOW THE NEW E-COMMERCE BILL COULD SEND JACK STRAW TO JAIL

        At the bottom of this email you will find the text of a letter
        sent to Home Secretary Jack Straw MP by Malcolm Hutty, a
        volunteer from the e-campaign group STAND.org.uk

        It's no ordinary letter.

        Indeed, should the Government's E-Commerce Bill reach the
        statute book unamended, the mere receipt of a similar
        missive could see the Home Secretary liable to a sentence
        of two years in jail.

        How? Why?

        The letter explains all, as does the STAND.org.uk Website at
        http://www.stand.org.uk



        >> >> ABOUT STAND.org.uk

        Created by around 20 volunteers from the UK new media
        industry, the STAND.org.uk e-campaign (http://www.stand.org.uk)
        aims to focus MPs' attention on widespread public discontent
        over the Government's proposed legislation controlling
        electronic commerce.

        To date over 5,400 UK Net users have promised to educate and
        inform their MP about encryption and digital signatures, many by
        publishing their "@doption" certificates on their personal
        Websites. All but a handful of MPs have now been "@dopted" by
        one or more concerned constituents.

        STAND's innovative e-campaign has received numerous awards and
        commendations, including the 1999 New Statesman New Media
        Advocacy Award and New Media Age magazine's Special Award
        For Innovation.



        >> >>  CONTACT DETAILS FOR STAND.ORG.UK

        Stefan Magdalinski / Tom Loosemore
        Tel: 07931 376 142
        Fax: 0171 681 2057
        email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



        >>>> TEXT OF LETTER SENT TO JACK STRAW BY MR MALCOLM HUTTY


        Dear Mr Straw,

        How the E-commerce Bill could send YOU to jail

        Please find at the end of the letter a confession to a
        crime, which has been affirmed by Statutory Declaration.
        The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police has been
        informed that you are in possession of this information.

        You will not be able to understand the confession, because
        the words have been scrambled using a strong cryptographic key.
        This key was created in your name and has been registered
        on international public key servers.

        The police may come and demand that you supply the key required
        to make this message intelligible. If you fail to do so you
        would be committing an offence under the E-Commerce Bill
        rendering you liable to imprisonment for up to 2 years.

        The fact that you don't possess this key won't help you
        unless you can prove that you don't have it. I wish you well
        in proving that it isn't hidden away on a disk in your
        secretary's home, or squirreled away on the Internet somewhere.
        We might have sent it to you last week; but according to the
        Bill, the police won't have to prove you ever had it at all.

        Even if you can prove that you don't have it you would
        STILL be liable for imprisonment unless you give information to
        the police that enables them to decrypt the key. Unfortunately
        for you this is impossible, because we've destroyed all copies
        of the key in our possession.

        If the police ask you keep the demand to hand over the key
        secret, telling anyone would render you liable to 5 years
        in jail.

        So you couldn't complain - or explain your predicament - to the
        PM or Home Secretary, to the Chief Whip or a journalist, or
        even to another policeman.

        Happily for all of us, the E-Commerce Bill has not yet been
        enacted by Parliament, so we have not in fact set you up for
        jail time. The Bill will be introduced in the coming session.
        I hope this exercise has demonstrated some of the drafting
        flaws in the Bill as it stands - copies of which are available
        from the DTI.

        I hope we have also demonstrated that it is not the
        perpetrators of crime who would suffer under these draconian
        new powers, but innocent parties who are in receipt of
        communications from miscreants. This is why such sober
        organisations as BT, Hewlett Packard and Microsoft have
        publicly criticised the Bill at each stage of its development.

        I trust that when the Bill reaches the House we can rely on your
        most careful scrutiny. Further analysis is available on our
        web site at: http://www.stand.org.uk/

        I am, Sir, Your most obedient servant,

         Malcolm Hutty

           -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
           Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
           MessageID: 4ip9dARaGOZiVnU9TThYSu4zn2SAAZoW


        qANQR1DBwk4Dg60RRdBhctIQC/9KyjRA6qcZ0lPbb4fA59T6ZL33KjK80+AoP4hR
        /hycfEk1j9LgTST8NP6yq70x2R5N1If0oktkKLjALPxpXhRYdV260SWOkUMHCc/h
        Mk6n0xy0T8Klf9kmrcD2/1jg1HEApgU09zKPt5uktwPbvbyWEcDCSmQzb2K2rPDm
        DwDxk0Paq0vl9wg4spALX9tliVgFg7vVJBeXwYtCeCLFjw5Qcf9lrlLvRIWsZ/WW
        VgWUnSaqIqx6pLhMgyY/TFGlztn/KLluPw71Kxw3N7apabnHzomuSi1upAaRHOnY
        GUgdBGCA4sXotN9arXI9kbRZsoMVCkqb5WCuhtY80vqW9I2BDm/iVJ75a28dFK4A
        lKRNbmgbfFO42AKdUUmfo2BtO6MuZVKG+Eqq0M4XeKCZuD0ISRXlLrW2MguUt6vY
        iizH56i1feODJ0XlNeYv19o0uscMAJA3ly5ApHg69UoJXbIrGJImf/zciGRp/m58
        s5BCXqeF+GQYpJ8/d0n0Q2XabVBzM8hkKU0d5cgbHa+53f5Yx1cjz1GCZGeusIID
        GXAG9gZsbmrtEY8wnBS0fCUSUMW9OrSu5ULTTltrOlNQ/lb+ohVFFWPcbZGdV+C1
        GCshaow/w0wb64XoDzT40a8GZWMfmMDCVXb64ajAGoenMPtjd3B5HB6vvYEsF2S3
        NbkeIz+mSP7bEzlpZt1A0qh1kMkKnqZD6tiewBgBX6xjfVkRDUpM9SqcZ1HTRAnG
        PunG4WDHUOkEMv+m1RYNf57E/RRbKts3GDIudRCpOzNv7UUiSAiDL6Vvxh8UyMhi
        BKmcobYyKuSEYmrNcnErlMGCZZz5MK//NFWMS25eWR5HpMJBOno8zrV5GjvQ6DwI
        NMyqKrlF4VTY1Lb8JYOgLQhwV6KBuAubEYUrOFaI4LYm2RopcKY9zJBncTOV2POr
        qmZYnwYnWU57uiaQ7v7Nzl4vhdhw+8nA/CvOXFno5DLmNRiyp7alQTuvO+eCRngK
        UU+b8IruO3ADBFTaSr/0aAhTEUVnbUZjCYstnKqk9BYSF4+V4Sxn46BveDEMNvlw
        cXwkLqqlrDEq8YsfPUoCOOAsj17hPTccKyyMGEoKtTDjg2FctEFtO1GlXdFbXI3C
        wWl04yqYeTvOVoJppxUhP7IRdxPfN291oHcceBV+CJV95Pf5ae97ZYcoL72Ugsuv
        PkObsWDcfHwezxzgmina6fS0wIassy5SPElMahNHfEnazun0V2NQDMRImAjv4aEj
        8C0OmQHn4hg5V0/owC/+qFsaXcTl2AjAq2atRMUi0tiITgRkE0oFSXyFMyzOchGE
        iqm8TYVFm0YyF+DDu8MfGN4J8Xcoi30KaURWgiB5ChvvdF2lsc1lHKSLgtL9rCqc
        8h38cJf2qEIjIPb5U0SCMOO3pRxcf9OjRWtbDr8YUsBSI5ptsTjd06ewPgx9dw5G
        M6xYimKl6bpEGilOf7qcxJR+L4z1l5oFiwaXyiBmputuObj5mKldsKcg5PW56bT/
        1acGveC4iqEtepu/8vULsKsJQkQe9ajiU+YNL2ybvlfzH1blCg===YJkl
           -----END PGP MESSAGE---




Reply via email to