> Declan McCullagh wrote:
> > "Child pornographers could distribute their
> > filth unimpeded," the House Permanent
> > Select Committee on Intelligence said.
>
> Doesn't this give the game away a little? What has intelligence to do
> with child pornography? Except in the context of a damn good way to
> justify spying on your citizens (which _is_ intelligence) to the
> gullible, of course.
Unless it blocks their free source of kiddie porn. (I have little trust in
anyone who wants to spy on their neighbors as a general rule. They remind me
far too much of peeping toms and probably attract such people as well due to
the job description.)
Notice how no one is questioning who is going to prevent THEM from
distributing (also known as "planting") kiddie porn.
> BTW, did you know that the right to put paper in your pockets, freely
> and without inhibition, allows child pornographers to distribute their
> filth unimpeded? LEA have a right to inspect the contents of all
> pockets. This is self-evident.
Furthermore, you could have a hole in your pocket and be playing with
yourself! The moral crusade for all that is right must prevent such actions!
You could go blind you know!
> Woah! Hold it. You, sir - are you walking around with a CLOSED BOOK?
> Clearly a peddler of child porn. Clap him in irons!
I guess it is time for Book Escrow(tm).
