[CC:'s to list I don't subscribe to deleted.] one possible escape clause here is a constitutional provision regarding immunity of legislators for acts in congress: [from article 1, section 6] ".. for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place." .. so, as I read it, the only entity capable of enforcing the gag order (i.e., preventing a legislator from repeating what he heard in the closed briefing in a subsequent open legislative session) is the congress itself, and that, likely, only after the fact. But then again, i'm not a lawyer, and I'm also not sure how this provision has been interpreted in the past.. - Bill
- House committee ditches SAFE for law enforcement version Declan McCullagh
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law enforcement... Declan McCullagh
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law enforce... Marc Horowitz
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law enf... Dan Geer
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE fo... John Denker
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law enf... Declan McCullagh
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law... Declan McCullagh
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law enf... Rick Smith
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law enforce... John A. Limpert
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law enforce... Bill Frantz
- RE: House committee ditches SAFE for law enforcement... Lucky Green
- Re: House committee ditches SAFE for law enforcement... Peter Gutmann