Team,

So we have PFS operational on Roxy (kind off).
You can do PFS build of Roxy and build works fine.
PFS UI is significantly simplified, so you do not need to deal with all the 
secondary settings.
Unfortunate side effect is that for PFS local cache on admin node, that has 
latest bits as of build time, is used for latest bits.
One can change all removed custom PFS UI parameters in raw mode.

I had only tested it on Ubuntu-12.04.2.

Here is the list of packages you will need to for Ubuntu build:
debootstrap git curl openssl build-essential mkisofs binutils rpm genisoimage 
erlang ssh markdown libsqlite3-dev ruby rubygems1.8 python-pip dh-make 
python-dev libxslt1-dev molly-guard python-numpy libffi-dev libssl-dev 
python-lxml libxml2 python-virtualenv

and

gem install json kwalify bundler rake rcov rspec net-http-digest_auth i18n

The standard: dev build -os Ubuntu-12.04 -pfs
Will do the PFS build. Replace os version with your favorite to try it out if 
you want to.

Smoketest passes with all the changes for non-PFS build and for PFS-build with 
PFS component deployment (manual).

The following 2 scenarios has not been tested:

*         Non-PFS deployment of PFS build

*         PFS deployment using openstack repos instead of git Barlamp one.

All these changes are in and tested before we flipped Havana bits.

Happy usage.

[cid:image001.jpg@01CECB1C.C3A052F0]


Arkady Kanevsky, Ph.D.

Director of SW Development

Enterprise Solution Group

+1 512 723 5264 | arkady_kanev...@dell.com<mailto:arkady_kanev...@dell.com>



<<inline: image001.jpg>>

_______________________________________________
Crowbar mailing list
Crowbar@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar
For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/

Reply via email to