> Why? We already have > https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Videos > https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Introductory-Videos > https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Developer-Videos (strangely empty) > and IMHO the wiki is a much more suitable place for videos, because they're > not strongly coupled to a particular revision of code. If a list of videos > goes in the repo, then git diff between branches will show differences in the > list of videos, which doesn't make any sense to me. Sorry to be picky, but > proliferation of semi-duplicated documentation seems to be a common problem > with Crowbar in general, so it'd be great to avoid making it worse. Feel > free to correct me if I missed something.
Adam, that's a good point. Here's my dilemma -> the notes from those videos are documentation that's persisted. I think that should be in the docs, not on the wiki. The videos are helpful to backstop the docs but age. We need to have a system that encourages the text to be written and I don't see that from the wiki pages. _______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/ _______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
