Would appreciate someone checking the formatting of this patch. Maybe a
table is excessive for only listing the one signal added by
POSIX-1.2024, but I thought it was good to match the table used for
other specifications.
Collin
>From 2a08ab2bd538aed5144522a45eb168174288a334 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-ID: <2a08ab2bd538aed5144522a45eb168174288a334.1751087822.git.collin.fu...@gmail.com>
From: Collin Funk <collin.fu...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 22:15:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] doc: list signals added by POSIX.1-2024
* doc/coreutils.texi (Signal specifications): Mention that POSIX.1-2024
added SIGWINCH.
---
doc/coreutils.texi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/coreutils.texi b/doc/coreutils.texi
index 141cbc1f8..d7a94e5f8 100644
--- a/doc/coreutils.texi
+++ b/doc/coreutils.texi
@@ -1173,6 +1173,15 @@ @node Signal specifications
also support at least eight real-time signals called @samp{RTMIN},
@samp{RTMIN+1}, @dots{}, @samp{RTMAX-1}, @samp{RTMAX}.
+@noindent
+All systems conforming to POSIX 1003.1-2024 also support the following
+signals:
+
+@table @samp
+@item WINCH
+Terminal window size changed.
+@end table
+
@node Disambiguating names and IDs
@section chown, chgrp, chroot, id: Disambiguating user names and IDs
@cindex user names, disambiguating
--
2.50.0
