Dear coreboot Community, Please be reminded that our upcoming leadership meetings for both the early GMT and late GMT time zones are scheduled for Wednesday, November 12, 2025. [1]
Kindly take a moment to update the agenda items with issues you'd like to discuss during these meetings. [2] Thank you. ## Current Agenda Items ### [Elyes] Can we remove OpenSBI from 3rdparty? * Currently, the 3rdparty/opensbi requires Position Independent Executables (PIEs), which coreboot does not support (https://qa.coreboot.org/job/coreboot-gerrit/285600/testReport/junit/(root)/clang/EMULATION_QEMU_RISCV_RV64/). So far, coreboot has been using an old version of OpenSBI. However, this outdated version is now preventing us from updating Clang and GCC. ### [Max] Can we auto abandon gerrit patches after a certain period of time? * Sadly, people don’t abandon their patches even if they didn’t touch them for years. That has some downsides. For example, at some point someone (I don’t remember who) removed himself from hundreds of old patches, which caused them to go back to the top of the list in gerrit. It's also useful to have a more sane list of open patches for searching purposes. I also sometimes just forget about patches, so it would be nice to get a notification from gerrit. ### [Werner] How to deal with the signed FSP approach from Intel * As presented at the last OSFC (https://www.osfc.io/2025/talks/intel-r-signed-fsp-and-verified-boot/) Intel has plans to only execute signed FSP binaries. The current approach from Intel will heavily affect coreboot’s architecture. Can we start a discussion [1](https://coreboot.org/calendar.html) [2](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NRXqXcLBp5pFkHiJbrLdv3Spqh1Hu086HYkKrgKjeDQ) _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
