Hi Frans!

Proposal is creating a COM directory ‘src/com’ where the module manufacturer 
and module name are used. (Similar to mainboard).
In this src/com directory common module support is placed.
mainboard will use this COM module and contains the ‘variant’ code.

Sounds like a good idea to me; I wouldn't call the directory src/com though 
since my first association with that name would be some sort of communication 
device support. Maybe src/som (system on module)?

I think I talked with Nico and siro on that some months ago on IRC, so it would 
be good if they could also comment on this.

I think the other option we talked about was having the module as a base and 
the official carrier board as mainboard variant and then use the module code in 
a mainboard with the vendor being the vendor of the carrier module which is a 
variant of the other mainboard code.
Putting this into a separate directory is probably the cleaner option though.

If the variants approach works well for that, I'd like to keep using that and 
not introducing some new infrastructure; if that causes some major pain, it 
might also be worth investigating how to improve things there.

Regards
Felix

--
Felix Held
c/o cyberkombinat23
Steinstraße 23
76133 Karlsruhe
Germany

m...@felixheld.de

Ust-ID: DE301814366
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org

Reply via email to