one thing we don't want to is change however is 'Intel_Strago' as the default mainboard family for google/cyan variants, since at least one Braswell platform kernel driver uses that identifier to enable certain quirks
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 2:45 PM Lance Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not sure how many of receiver still working at Intel or still working > in chrome team, but I think that's okay abandon support for Strago. > > Nico Huber <[email protected]> 于2019年4月13日周六 上午6:59写道： > >> Hi all, >> >> I just noticed that there is a seemingly abandoned board that creates >> a lot of maintenance burden for coreboot, also because it's using FSP >> UPDs that are not present in the upstream header files. >> >> Does anybody still care about Intel/Strago? If not, I'd prefer to drop >> it immediately. It's only a reference board, so likely never had many >> users. >> >> If somebody at Intel still cares about coreboot support for this board, >> please have a look at this issue [1]. >> >> Nico >> >> [1] https://github.com/IntelFsp/FSP/issues/14 >> _______________________________________________ >> coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> > _______________________________________________ > coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
