On 23.10.2015 18:32, Martin Roth wrote: >> So, is there a third option that I'm missing? Other opinions? >>>> The third option would be a plain text format which is easy to parse >>>> but still covers the spec well. > > I'd say that we should store the SPDs as binaries - these are easy to > use at build time, and there's no reason to build them every time. > They change, but infrequently. Then we need a better tool. That would also apply to a bootblock that needs a specific assembler or romcc. Would you distribute that as a binary too?
Nico -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
