On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:39 AM Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's more trivial not to have a tool in the first place. > It's also more trivial not to add a new dependency to our build process. > Especially a dependency that is lacking in portability (ie. users > can't build coreboot anymore because they can't run go) > > Sorry, but no. > > Actually the idea crossed my mind because I just saw a different tool hit the tree yesterday that was written in ... guess what language? I would have accepted the 'go is not supported' argument a year ago. Now? It's everywhere. But, ok, ship binaries. I guess we'll grow the blobs. ron
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
