Dear Gerd, dear Greg,
sorry for the late reply. Am Dienstag, den 21.04.2015, 11:31 -0400 schrieb Gregg Levine: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Di, 2015-04-21 at 02:24 -0500, Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand > > wrote: > > > The QEMU x86_64 Q35 fails verification as of commit > > > 7ab46f8085146db57699001462da871f2e4d9965 > > > > Log says at the end "RAPTOR ENGINEERING AUTOMATED TEST BOOT SUCCESS" > > > > Can you fix your test case and stop spamming the list please? > > > > > Please contact Timothy Pearson at Raptor Engineering > > > <[email protected]> regarding any issues stemming > > > from this notification > > > > [x] done. > > Hello! > My thoughts exactly. Thank you sir. > > I suspect somehow it was supposed to be internal to hs outfit only. > And something changed with regards to the logic behind how those > annoying e-mail messages being sent to us. > > As for the test cases, they are extremely confusing to me. How many of > us also were? The confusion could be solved in the mean time, but I still want to reply. After reading both of your replies to the test stand message, I was very angry and disappointed about the bad assumptions you both made and the, in my opinion, impolite style by using words like *spamming* and *annoying*. For the future I wish that we first assume that the other side is meaning well. So I should assume, both of you meant well too. But I just wanted to get it out. In the end, in my opinion, the Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand¹ is the best contribution to the coreboot infrastructure since the switching to a git based workflow. So big thanks to Raptor Engineering and Timothy! Thanks, Paul ¹ REATS is a strange acronym. Maybe a better name can be found. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
