On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Georgi, Patrick <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 16.06.2011, 21:50 +0800 schrieb Hamo: > We thought it's a good idea to mandate _some_ default, otherwise we'd > risk having incompatible image formats created by the same tool. > You mean that we use MSB as default now? > Question is if we should define native endianess per platform and let > cbfstool take care of things (instead of coreboot at runtime), adding a > flag to the CBFS header (which would have to be properly specified so > things are clear) > A new question: Why we use a binary file to create the rom but using an ELF to add a stage to this rom?
Thanks, Hamo -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
