On 6/4/11 10:47 AM, Sven Schnelle wrote:
motherboards can use this hook to get notified if someone writes
to the APM_CNT port (0xb2). If the hook returns 1, the chipset
specific hook is also skipped.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle<[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]>
---
src/include/cpu/x86/smm.h | 2 +-
src/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/smihandler.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/include/cpu/x86/smm.h b/src/include/cpu/x86/smm.h
index ad0984e..559b1b7 100644
--- a/src/include/cpu/x86/smm.h
+++ b/src/include/cpu/x86/smm.h
@@ -263,4 +263,4 @@ void __attribute__((weak)) northbridge_smi_handler(unsigned
int node, smm_state_
void __attribute__((weak)) southbridge_smi_handler(unsigned int node,
smm_state_save_area_t *state_save);
void __attribute__((weak)) mainboard_smi_gpi(u16 gpi_sts);
-
+int __attribute__((weak)) mainboard_apm_cnt(u8 data);
diff --git a/src/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/smihandler.c
b/src/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/smihandler.c
index aefa283..bccf6d5 100644
--- a/src/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/smihandler.c
+++ b/src/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/smihandler.c
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ static void southbridge_smi_apmc(unsigned int node,
smm_state_save_area_t *state
/* Emulate B2 register as the FADT / Linux expects it */
reg8 = inb(APM_CNT);
+ if (mainboard_apm_cnt&& mainboard_apm_cnt(reg8))
+ return;
Is it on purpose that the mainboard_apm_cnt function can prevent the
generic 82801gx code (including the not implemented C state
coordination) from running?
+
switch (reg8) {
case CST_CONTROL:
/* Calling this function seems to cause
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
