Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]> writes:

> * Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> [110312 01:18]:
>> Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  src/mainboard/lenovo/x60/mainboard.c |    5 +++++
>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/src/mainboard/lenovo/x60/mainboard.c 
>> b/src/mainboard/lenovo/x60/mainboard.c
>> index b8e6a49..79e4a83 100644
>> --- a/src/mainboard/lenovo/x60/mainboard.c
>> +++ b/src/mainboard/lenovo/x60/mainboard.c
>> @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ static void wlan_enable(void)
>>  
>>  static void mainboard_enable(device_t dev)
>>  {
>> +    /* Enable 1600/1604 register pair */
>> +    ec_set_bit(0x00, 0x05);
>> +    /* switch to just enabled registers for ACPI */
>> +    ec_set_ports(0x1604, 0x1600);
>> +
>
> I think you only need to use the high ports in SMM code to avoid race
> conditions.

Yes. But the original BIOS switches to those ports at the same time, and
i want to do it the same way. Makes comparing bus cycles easier, and has
no disadvantages IMHO.

-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to