On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:06:23PM -0800, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Should we rename the part to w83627 then?
That's too generic, many other Winbond Super I/Os start with that prefix: w83627dhg w83627ehg w83627hf w83627thf w83627thg w83627uhg (and probably some others) We could do w83627th, or w83627thf_g or so, but I guess it's also fine to just keep one of the two names. I'll post a follow-up patch which adds code comments like "This code supports W83627THF/THG" etc. to all Super I/Os anyway to document this a bit better. Uwe. -- http://hermann-uwe.de | http://sigrok.org http://randomprojects.org | http://unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
