Myles Watson wrote: > The attached patch calls init() again. It makes it match the comments again. > > Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <[email protected]> > It makes sense to use values in the device tree to parameterize > device code for specific mainboards, but I don't see the point of > parameterizing mainboard-specific code from the device tree. It's no secret that I'd like coreboot to have zero mainboard-specific code, and allow parameters to be used to completely describe a board. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
