--- On Fri, 5/2/10, Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > There's no way to just make it relevant? Can't a
> non-TSC CPU support
> > something meaningful in that variable?
> > (I don't know,just asking)
> >
> FILO uses this for its timeouts in various places. If there
> is a better
> way to do what FILO does, FILO should be fixed
It's not hard, at least for the user-visible delays - I'll
try to post a patch for that too.
regards,
Biff.
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
