> Maybe better name would be bootblock-autorelocation-ldscript.patch > in case if anyone would consider it as worth keeping etc, > Signed-off Maciej Pijanka <[email protected]>
This patch saves 28K on my s2895, and 55K on qemu. Anybody have a strong objection to that? Are we trying to have bootblock size be constant for each board? Does it mess up future plans for backwards compatibility? It uses an alignment of 256 bytes. Is that sufficient? Is it necessary? Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
