Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 15.10.2009 13:04, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > >> ron minnich wrote: >> >> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Myles Watson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> So I guess the question is how should we make sure the stack and heap are >>>> sized correctly. Using malloc to allocate the memory for lzma makes sense, >>>> but it is used in CAR too, so that complicates our decision. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> lzma decompressor gets a void * from the caller. Caller, if CAR, uses >>> on-stack pointer. RAM code can, if desired, >>> use malloc'ed memory? >>> >>> >>> >>> >> We never call lzma while in CAR. Now that would be kind of silly, would it? >> >> > > Well, originally ulmza() was designed to be runnable in CAR on the OLPC. >
What for? Decompressing to cache? This sounds a bit odd, with a 16kB scratchpad, and only 128KB cache. Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
