Peter Stuge schrieb:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Right now, flashrom assumes that if a coreboot table exists, the
board NEEDS a board specific enable function. If there is none
(because it is not needed), flashrom will complain.
Three options are available to solve this:
1. Leave the code as-is and confuse developers and users alike.
2. Add info to the coreboot table that the board doesn't need any
special flash enabling.
3. Provide dummy functions for every board supported by coreboot.
4. Remove the table lookup completely.
5. Make flashrom continue silently instead of complaining.
I prefer either of 4 or 5 over 1-3.
Removing the check completely is non-sense. Not complaining in case
there is no entry sounds like the way to go though. I think we should
focus on this once flashrom 1.0 has been released.
Stefan
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
