On 17.03.2009 16:53 Uhr, Myles Watson wrote:
> 2009/3/17 Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]>:
>
>> On 17.03.2009 15:43 Uhr, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>>
>>> One suggestion - instead of making the "floating table" be a sub-table
>>> of a coreboot-table, make it a stand alone data structure. As it
>>> stands, I think existing code might get confused when it finds a
>>> coreboot table without any real data in it.
>>>
>>>
>> No worries about that, almost all existing code is fixed up by now.
>> Also, the existing implementations are not less confused if they don't
>> find a table at all. The format was designed to be flexible enough to
>> handle any number of subtables dynamically.
>>
>> Attached is the patch against libpayload.
>>
> Acked-by: Myles Watson <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks,
> Myles
>
>
Thanks, r4016
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [email protected] • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
