Pattrick Hueper wrote: > >> + my_wrl(0x10 * 4, 0xf000f065); > >> + my_wrb(0x000ff065, 0xcf); > > > > Has this gotten some feedback? The fix is correct! > > This code is currently in svn, isnt it?
Yes - I was looking at an older patch. Thanks! //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
