On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:05 PM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote:
> one more note. > > It's looking, increasingly, like future CPUs will require > initlalization very early in startup. Some will require it right after > initram; some during initram; and some BEFORE initram. > > But they will all require it in what we call stage 1 -- before the > device tree exists. > > The implication is that the device tree may not be that useful in > future for "CPUs as devices". I think we should plan around this. CPUs > were always kind of a stretch to make a device anyway. Just FYI. I'm agreeing with this. I think proper init for the cpu right after disable_car() would greatly speed up the boot process. Carl-Daniel, would there be any problem with calling functions to enable mtrrs and the cache (if it's not already) from the end of disable_car()? If not permanently, at least for the time being, to find out if it would help and to reduce the current 20 minute test cycle? Thanks, Corey
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

