On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:10 AM, Kevin O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering what you felt was lacking in your previous idea of > passing a new stack location/execution address into disable_car()? When I floated the idea last year everyone hated it :-) > > Also, in an earlier email I suggested the possibility of switching the > stack before calling disable_car: > > http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2008-September/038611.html > calling disable_car needs a stack. Where did it come from? You might as well put all the nasty code in one place. ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
