On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:20:40AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > In particular I'd like to see the 'Example and support code' section fleshed > > out a bit more; some examples of code like that and/or vendors doing the > > right thing would be great. I'm a little fuzzy as to what kind of code this > > is. > > > > New point: > "Provides example code via e-mail, no NDA/license agreement required" > should be equivalent to web page with click-through license or better.
Fixed. The Alix.1C now has four hares! > "Code is freely available under a free software license. It can be > downloaded on the web after agreeing to a click-through license." What > happens if the click-through license is the GPL? Many people seem to do this (cf. any free software install for OS X), but it does not make sense to do so - there's nothing in the GPL that requires a click-through if you want to use the software. > > Also, the score is heavily skewed towards documentation right now (80 out of > > 124 points). I think that is fine but others may think otherwise. > > > > I just made up the hackability scores - do they make sense to people? Should > > a JTAG header be rewarded higher than it is? > > > > IIRC for some processors a JTAG header is simply not an option. Ah, good point. Not sure what to do about that though in terms of scoring. Hrm, that hardware gets penalized a bit (5 points they can not get). Thanks, Ward. -- Ward Vandewege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
