> The problem I see with this is that a hypervisor can have significant > overhead. (One has to task switch to the hypervisor to do IO.) Also, > I doubt everyone will agree on a single hypervisor implementation > (kvm, vmware, virtualbox, xen, microsoft's vm, etc.). > My vote is for virtualbox, it is the sweetest one I have seen yet :-)
-- Thanks, Joseph Smith Set-Top-Linux www.settoplinux.org -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
