I am sorry, it was my fault. I have not updated JAR. Now it seems to be working as expected. Thanks!
Vadim On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 21:23, Jothi Padmanabhan <[email protected]> wrote: > If you had set the number of reduce tasks to 0, you should not see the > reduce>sort. How did you set the number of reducers? > You could do that by doing > > job.setNumReduceTasks(0); > > Jothi > > > On 2/25/09 10:34 AM, "Vadim Zaliva" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2008 at 10:07, Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Setting it to 0 skips all of the buffering, sorting, merging, and shuffling. >>> It passes the objects straight from the mapper to the output format, which >>> writes it straight to hdfs. >> >> I just tried to set number or Reduce tasks to 0, but Job Tracker shows >> Reduce task working, doing "reduce > sort". I have a big data set and >> it takes a while. It would be a good to find a way to skip it. >> >> Vadim > >
