On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 07:43:39 GMT, Quan Anh Mai <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi @merykitty, thanks for the suggestion — I agree it is reasonable. >> >> Would you prefer that we expand this PR’s scope to also cover the scalar >> side (`XorI` / `XorL`), or keep the current focus on vector and vector mask >> only? >> >> @dean-long @theRealAph, what do you think? > > @erifan You don't need to actually include the scalar side in this PR, but > please structure this PR so that the infrastructure is ready for us to easily > use for the scalar nodes. Hi @merykitty I’ve updated the code as you suggested. Could you help take another look when you have a chance, thanks~ ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32095#issuecomment-6733222638
