On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:44:03 GMT, Volker Simonis <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't understand why we can't just write the corresponding tests in such a > way that they work independently of what is the default setting for > `tryReadAheadAfterTrailer` such that we don't have to change the test every > time we change the default setting for that property? I hope we agree that > both defaults for `tryReadAheadAfterTrailer` are legal and valid, so why > shouldn't the corresponding tests work for both of them? I don't think we need this in main line, it's something for the downstream distribution that has changed the default. Instead, I think our energy should be spent on the next steps to add a new constructor (or factory method) and deprecate the 2 existing constructors. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31790#issuecomment-5030735846
