On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:51:38 GMT, David Beaumont <[email protected]> wrote:

> Summary: Add two new methods to ImageReader to make SystemModuleReader more 
> performant.
> 
> Analysis of benchmarks shows that when the vast majority of resources 
> (~11,000 in the Perfstartup-SwingSet-G1 benchmark) tested for in 
> SystemModuleReader do NOT exist, performance is degraded compared to this 
> code prior to the refactoring in JDK-8360037.
> 
> The current refactoring of ImageReader has everything going through a single 
> "findNode()" method for simplest possible encapsulation, but while this is 
> functionally correct, it's not tuned for testing for the non-existence of 
> resources.
> 
> In particular:
> 1. SystemModuleReader only requests resources (i.e. things in the jimage file 
> with paths *not* starting /modules/ or /packages/). This means findNode() 
> does two look-ups for the resource, the first of which will always fail.
> 2. The containsResource() logic doesn't need to create and cache nodes in 
> ImageReader, it can just check for the presence of an ImageLocation 
> corresponding to a resource.
> 
> Thus two new methods are added to resolve these cases:
> * findResourceNode(module, path)
> * containsResource(module, path)
> 
> Their API takes module and path separately so as to not be confusable with 
> findNode(nodename).
> 
> However care must be taken to prevent these methods being fooled into 
> returning non-resource entries (this was possible before the refactoring by 
> using module names like "modules" or "packages") so new tests have been added.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 9949ee31
Author:    David Beaumont <[email protected]>
Committer: Chen Liang <[email protected]>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/9949ee3163a31f6f3c13c4fe34e8c0166210719e
Stats:     175 lines in 4 files changed: 153 ins; 13 del; 9 mod

8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and 
footprint

Reviewed-by: alanb, rriggs, jpai

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27203

Reply via email to