On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:59:07 GMT, Roger Riggs <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Thanks Roger, I have updated the name accordingly. WRT updating the 
>> implementation to use nextLong(), since we are no longer using the higher 
>> percision bits in the first half of the UUID, we are using random bits in 
>> their place, so we would need to call `nextLong` twice and overwrite with 
>> the timestamp etc. if I understand correctly. From what ive seen in the 
>> microbenchmarks, this results in a large perfomance dec.
>
> ok, looks good, allow some time for the other interested commenters to 
> approve.

will do, thanks Roger

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25303#discussion_r2341331534

Reply via email to