On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:58:21 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation >> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever >> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to >> shrink a "TLDR" essay to something concise for readers, such as pointing to >> that list at `vmIntrinsics.hpp` instead of "a list". > > Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Updates, thanks to John src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java line 34: > 32: * recognized by {@code vmIntrinsics.hpp} and may be subject to > intrinsification > 33: * by the HotSpot VM (see {@code LibraryCallKit::try_to_inline} in {@code > 34: * library_call.cpp}) if an intrinsic is available. Intrinsification > replaces a This lead sentence is too long to read conveniently, partly because it is broken up by a parenthetical. Suggest: The `@IntrinsicCandidate` indicates that an annotated method is recognized by `vmIntrinsics.hpp` and may be subject to intrinsification by the HotSpot VM. (See `LibraryCallKit::try_to_inline` in `library_call.cpp` for logic that checks if an intrinsic is available and applicable at a given call site.) ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24777#discussion_r2054909244