On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 16:25:30 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @kimbarrett Do you have a change coming to allow waitForPendingReferences be >> used by WB? I assume this will at least add a comment to the method (or >> whatever it changes to) to make it clear that it's for testing. > > @AlanBateman I've not done any work on JDK-8305186. There has also been > discussion about making > that function non-private or even public (though with concerns about > specification difficulty) for use in > places like this. > > @shipilev I'm working on a reply, but it might be long-ish. That outpacing > issue for some tests is why this > code wasn't switched away from jdk.internal.ref.Cleaner a long time ago. I'm > still looking at it, but I currently > don't think the canary provides a reliable solution to that. I would like to integrate this PR. How are you doing, @kimbarrett? Have you found any major holes in it? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22165#discussion_r1948705265
